Description

The Federal Trade Commission today took action against online home buying firm Opendoor Labs Inc., for cheating potential home sellers by tricking them into thinking that they could make more money selling their home to Opendoor than on the open market using the traditional sales process. The FTC alleged that Opendoor pitched potential sellers using misleading and deceptive information, and in reality, most people who sold to Opendoor made thousands of dollars less than they would have made selling their homes using the traditional process. Under a proposed administrative order, Opendoor will have to pay $62 million and stop its deceptive tactics.

Opendoor promised to revolutionize the real estate market but built its business using old-fashioned deception about how much consumers could earn from selling their homes on the platform, said Samuel Levine, Director of the FTCs Bureau of Consumer Protection.There is nothing innovative about cheating consumers.

Opendoor, headquartered in Tempe, Arizona, operates an online real estate business that, among other things, buys homes directly from consumers as an alternative to consumers selling their homes on the open market. Advertised as an iBuyer, Opendoor claimed to use cutting-edge technology to save consumers money by providing market-value offers and reducing transaction costs compared with the traditional home sales process.

Opendoors marketing materials included charts comparing their consumers net proceeds from selling to Opendoor versus on the market. Those charts almost always showed that consumers would make thousands of dollars more by selling to Opendoor. In fact, the complaint states, the vast majority of consumers who sold to Opendoor actually lost thousands of dollars compared with selling on the traditional market, because the companys offers have been below market value on average and its costs have been higher than what consumers typically pay when using a traditional realtor.

The agencys investigation found that Opendoor also violated the law by misrepresenting that:

  • Opendoor used projected market value prices when making offers to buy homes, when in fact those prices included downward adjustments to the market values;
  • Opendoor made money from disclosed fees, when in reality it made money by buying low and selling high;
  • consumers likely would have paid the same amount in repair costs whether they sold their home through Opendoor or in traditional sales; and
  • consumers likely would have paid less in costs by selling to Opendoor than they would pay in traditional sales.

Enforcement Action

Opendoor has agreed to a proposed order that requires the company to:

  • Pay $62 million: The order requires Opendoor to pay the Commission $62 million, which is expected to be used for consumer redress.
  • Stop deceiving potential home sellers: The order prohibits Opendoor from making the deceptive, false, and unsubstantiated claims it made to consumers about how much money they will receive or the costs they will have to pay to use its service.
  • Stop making baseless claims: The order requires Opendoor to have competent and reliable evidence to support any representations made about the costs, savings, or financial benefits associated with using its service, and any claims about the costs associated with traditional home sales.

The Commission vote to accept the consent agreement was 5-0. The FTC will publish a description of the consent agreement package in the Federal Register soon. The agreement will be subject to public comment for 30 days, after which the Commission will decide whether to make the proposed consent order final. Instructions for filing comments appear in the published notice. Once processed, comments will be posted on Regulations.gov.

NOTE: When the Commission issues a consent order on a final basis, it carries the force of law with respect to future actions. Each violation of such an order may result in a civil penalty of up to $46,517.

Comments
Order by: 
Per page:
 
  • There are no comments yet
   Comment Record a video comment
 
 
 
     
Related Feed Entries
Federal prosecutors wrote a letter to U.S. District Court Judge Lewis Kaplan on Friday, requesting that he modify the conditions of Sam Bankman-Frieds bail to include ban on private communications with current and former employees of FTX and Alameda Research.Source: Coin Desk - Digital currency
an hour ago · From Coin Desk - Digital currency
A New York woman was sentenced today to 45 months in prison for her role in the submission of fraudulent loan applications seeking more than $9.2 million in forgivable Paycheck Protection Program (PPP) loans guaranteed by the Small Business Administration under the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (CARES) Act.Source: Justice News - Cyber-crime
5 hours ago · From Justice News - Cyber-crime
The back-and-forth about the ownership of WazirX could have a devastating effect on the Indian exchange and its users.Source: Coin Desk - Digital currency
5 hours ago · From Coin Desk - Digital currency
The 20 artists behind the latest installment of the NFT collectives Grails project, including Matt Kane, All Seeing Seneca and Josie Bellini, were revealed post-mint.Source: Coin Desk - Digital currency
6 hours ago · From Coin Desk - Digital currency
Also: Polygons MATIC token gained 8%, while Arbitrum-based decentralized trading platform Vela Exchange's DXP token surged 26%. Equities closed up.Source: Coin Desk - Digital currency
6 hours ago · From Coin Desk - Digital currency
Rate
0 votes
Info
Michael E Blair
Time is your GREATEST asset
01.08.2022 (01.08.2022)
23 Views
0 Subscribers
Recommend
Tags